University of Minnesota develops MyGender Dolls

The writer uses 'splashes taxpayer cash' and 'leftist Minnesota Gov.' to evoke anger and label the actors, and compares the dolls to 'Mr./Mrs. Potato Head' to trivialize the educational intent.

Only one side's critical framing is provided as the primary narrative The opposing view (the purpose of the dolls) is presented via quotes but framed as 'controversial' or 'leftist' The writer uses loaded language to describe the funding and the nature of the dolls

The title emphasizes 'Taxpayer-Funded' to create a negative association with the project; the use of 'removable genitalia' is repeated to highlight the most provocative aspect; the inclusion of Governor Walz's award links the project to a specific political figure to frame it as a political agenda.

The article includes a critical quote from a pediatrician to counter the researchers' claims. The article mentions the university's denial regarding the use of public funds for commercialization. The article relies heavily on reporting from the New York Post rather than original interviews.

The writer uses the label 'pro-transgender state-funded efforts' to categorize the program and emphasizes 'removable and swappable genitalia' to highlight the most provocative aspect of the product.

Only one side's perspective is presented in terms of editorial framing, though quotes from the creators are included. The article emphasizes the 'taxpayer-funded' aspect and the age of the children (4 years old) to provoke a specific reaction. The opposing view (the therapeutic purpose) is presented via quotes but framed as part of a 'pro-transgender' effort.