A high-priced novelty product faced severe value criticism.
Kim Kardashian's brand, Skims, removed its limited edition holiday advent calendar from its website following significant social media backlash. Customers complained that the product, priced at $148, did not provide sufficient value.
In response to the criticism, Skims is offering full refunds or store credits to customers who purchased the calendar. A company spokesperson stated that the product did not meet expectations for some customers.
Skims is offering full refunds or store credits to purchasers.
BBCTikTok users compared the items to objects found under a sofa or collected by a cat.
BBCSkims is offering refunds for its $148 advent calendar after customers criticized the low-value contents as a scam.
Skims is offering refunds for its $148 advent calendar following social media criticism regarding the poor quality of its contents.
Skims is offering refunds for its $148 advent calendar following social media criticism regarding the low quality of its contents.
Skims removed its $148 advent calendar from its website following customer complaints regarding its value.
The gap between celebrity brand premium and perceived product value
The conflict centers on whether a $148 price tag is justifiable for a collection of accessories like hair ties and keychains. Customers argue that a clothing brand selling a novelty calendar without actual clothing constitutes a failure of value. The company maintains the product was labeled as accessories and that the refund offer is a response to the fact that it did not meet some customers' expectations.
This tension reflects a broader structural shift in how novelty goods are consumed. High-priced bundles often rely on the prestige of a brand name to mask low individual item costs. However, the rise of public unboxing creates a transparency mechanism where the actual contents are scrutinized against the price in real time. The judgment of whether this was a calculated risk or a pricing error depends on whether the buyer viewed the purchase as an investment in the brand's aesthetic or a purchase of functional goods.
From product failure to the influence of unboxing culture
Most outlets focused on the immediate PR crisis and the refund offer. BBC went further by framing the event as a symptom of unboxing culture, citing market research to explain how social media has increased public scrutiny over value for money. This provides the necessary context to understand why a product that might have passed unnoticed in the past now triggers a rapid corporate retreat.
Bloomberg provided a distinct detail by reporting that the product was removed from the website via a source familiar with the matter, adding a layer of corporate movement beyond the public refund statement. Fox News attempted to establish a pattern of controversy by mentioning a previous product design, though this remains a peripheral detail to the specific value dispute of the calendar. The coverage generally succeeds in capturing the event, though it leans heavily on social media reactions rather than analyzing the brand's internal pricing strategy.
News Story
Card 2 of 2 in this story
This card follows “SKIMS faces backlash over $148 Accessories Advent Calendar”
Loading comments...