DOJ Refuses to Sign Declaration on Anti-Weaponization Fund
DOJ cites separation of powers in refusing judge's request.
Event Overview
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has refused to provide sworn written guarantees or declarations to a federal judge regarding the termination of a $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization fund'. The DOJ argues that this refusal is based on the separation of powers. The matter is being overseen by Judge Leonie Brinkema and involves legal representatives including Todd Blanche.
Issue Summary
Bias Distribution
Bias Signal Summary
Related Coverage
Related Cards
Coverage flow
Coverage volume
Focus shift
Story timeline
Recommended Reads
DOJ won’t sign declaration over canceled anti-weaponization fund: ‘Demands are unnecessary’
Washington Examiner
‘All Kinds of Sus’: Legal Analyst On MS NOW Sounds Alarm On Trump DOJ Refusing to Sign Declaration Killing Weaponization Fund
Mediaite
DOJ rebuffs judge's request to put in writing it won't move forward with 'anti-weaponization' fund - CNBC
CNBC
DOJ rebuffs judge's demand to state "anti-weaponization" fund is officially dead - CBS News
CBS News
The Justice Department (DOJ) has refused a court order from U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema to provide sworn declara
Legal analyst Scott MacFarlane appeared on MS NOW to discuss the Department of Justice's decision to reject a request fr
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has rejected a request from Judge Leonie Brinkema to provide written, sworn declarations
The Trump administration has declined to submit a court declaration from Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and Treasu
Loading comments...